Overcast
Overcast
59 °F
September 21, 2014
River Reporter Facebook pageTRR TwitterRSS Search Login
news

Scenic Route 6 proposal in Honesdale?

A scenic route designation would bring some restrictions to Main Street in Honesdale, PA.
TRR photo by Fritz Mayer

By Linda Drollinger
November 13, 2013

Before broaching familiar debates on traffic flow and the police chief job description at its November 11 monthly meeting, the Honesdale Borough Council was treated to a slide presentation by Ed Coar of the Wayne County Planning Department. Honesdale has been invited to join the 110 municipalities that currently comprise the Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Corridor that runs through 427 miles and 11 counties of the state’s northern tier. Coar described the presentation’s purpose as “full disclosure regarding the implications of Honesdale’s decision to sign on as a participating municipality in the corridor management plan.”

Coar outlined the proposal itself, the process by which it will be accomplished, and the obvious advantages and disadvantages of participation therein. The ultimate goal of the proposal is to obtain Federal Register designation of Route 6 as an All-American Road. This would make it officially a National Scenic Byway and would secure its inclusion in the federal directory of scenic byways. An obvious advantage to becoming a member municipality is the boon to tourism expected as a result of “putting Honesdale on the map.” In fact, the proposal was originally conceived by local tourist boards, and has been guided by them from its inception to the present.

But Coar cautioned that there are also several obvious disadvantages to participation. Chief among them is the requirement that each participating municipality pledge full compliance with the provisions of the proposal, which are as yet not clearly defined. Most of those provisions would center on land use management. When asked by the council if the borough would be liable for purchase of lands adjacent to Route 6 within its boundaries, Coar advised that grant money would probably be available for land purchases mandated by the provision, but that the borough would probably be liable for legal expenses associated with land use management.

One example of land use management already defined in the proposal is that of billboard use. Under the current proposal, billboards would be prohibited within the Route 6 corridor. New billboards would be prohibited. Existing billboards would be permitted under a grandfather clause until their current leases expire and prohibited thereafter. Coar noted that the corridor management plan may include elements not satisfactory to all participating municipalities.