Clear sky
Clear sky
55.4 °F
July 31, 2014
River Reporter Facebook pageTRR TwitterRSS Search Login
news

Sullivan lawmakers nix their own budget; money for environmental group axed

By Fritz Mayer
December 16, 2011

In a surprising move, the Sullivan County Legislature voted six to three on December 15 to reject the budget they have spent months working on. The legislators did not come up with a new budget by December 20; therefore the tentative budget, which was submitted by county manager David Fanslau on November 16, automatically became the adopted budget.

As a practical matter, it would not have made a great deal of difference if the legislature had approved the final budget because there are few differences between that and the tentative draft. However, one significant difference is that the $25,000 for Sullivan Alliance for Sustainable Development, which last week was inserted into the proposed final budget, will now not be available. There is a possibility that the newly elected legislators may decide to re-fund the group after the new board takes office in January.

The budget had come under criticism in recent weeks because it dips into reserve funds to the tune of more than $6 million, leaving very little reserves for the new legislature, which will have six new members.

The existing legislature had given the county manager direction that the budget should be created without surpassing the Albany-mandated 2% property tax cap, without cutting services and without laying off any county employees. With those parameters, the only option left was to dip heavily into reserves.

The existing legislature had given the county manager direction that the budget should be created without surpassing the Albany-mandate 2% property tax cap, without cutting services and without laying off any county employees. With those parameters, the only option left was to dip heavily into reserves.

The reasons the legislators gave for voting down the budget were varied. Legislator Jodi Goodman, chair of the Management and Budget Committee, said the reason she was not voting in favor of the budget was because “It has come to my attention that some of the newly elected and some of the existing legislators want to blame me for the budget; I want to remind the public, I’m one of nine.”

Lawmaker David Sager, who has been advocating that legislature override the 2% property tax cap with a supermajority vote, said it was probably a mistake that lawmakers voted for no tax increase in 2011 as opposed to a modest one.

S.C. Budget

I'd like to say I'm surprised that the legislature would cancel SASD's important role in the so called greening of the county, but given this bunch's history, not a chance. The one thing the legislature has proven over and over through the past decades is their cavalier attitude toward recycling, garbage and the landfill, creating one big failure after another. And now, they're doing their environmental thing "in house." I can promise you that that means they're doing nothing!