Clear sky
Clear sky
30.2 °F
December 07, 2016
River Reporter Facebook pageTRR TwitterRSS Search

Rouis calls for change in county government; Opposition seeks separate legal representation

The five legislators seeking to replace county manager David Fanslau are Alan Sorensen, left, Kitty Vetter, Cora Edwards, Cindy Gieger and Gene Benson.
TRR photo by Fritz Mayer

By Fritz Mayer
January 9, 2013

There is a split in the Sullivan County Legislature, but it doesn’t run along party lines. Instead, it pits four legislators who want county manager David Fanslau to remain in office for at least the next two years, against five legislators who want him to leave.

At a news conference at the government center on January 3, legislator Jonathan Rouis, the former legislative chair, called for the establishment of a charter revision committee to study the notion of changing the county government to one that would have a county executive, as is the case in Orange and Ulster counties.

In a reference to recent turmoil at the government center, Rouis said, “While I believe that on some level all my colleagues have the best interests of Sullivan County at heart, our current governmental structure has hampered our ability to make meaningful change and move the county forward for the betterment of the residents. Members of our legislature have become bogged down with managing staff and personal agendas, and are unable to focus the best of their efforts on policies that will move our county forward economically so that our residents can prosper.”

Rouis said he was not interested in becoming the county executive. He said the process of making the change would take at least two years and, in the meantime, he proposed that county manager David Fanslau be offered a new contract through the end of 2014.

But Fanslau’s tenure at the helm of the government has become the subject of much debate recently, and after Rouis’ remarks, five members of the legislature, a bipartisan coalition, each took to the podium and addressed the issue.

Alan Sorensen said that five members of the legislature had decided back in July that there needed to be a change in the county manager’s office. Sorensen said he was not necessarily opposed to investigating a change to a county executive form of government, but the issue of the current county manager needed to be addressed soon.

The county manager’s first term of office ended on December 31, 2012, but his agreement, or contract with the county, runs through the end of 2014. In 2007, the county charter was changed to require that six of nine legislative votes are needed to remove a county manager from office, but because legislators did not vote to grant Fanslau a new term of employment last July, there are disagreements as to whether his employment with the county can be ended by a simple majority.