Overcast
Overcast
26.6 °F
December 21, 2014
River Reporter Facebook pageTRR TwitterRSS Search
news

Groundswell to save the bridge; veterans, politicians, environmentalists unite

By Fritz Mayer
May 22, 2012

Transportation officials have been saying for years that the only possible course of action regarding the Pond Eddy Bridge is to tear down the old one and put up a new one. But a growing number of people are rejecting that assertion.

Larry Richardson, who represents the Town of Cocheton on the Upper Delaware Council, said “Some may see this as contradictory because I have supported replacing this bridge. I should like to point out that for a very long time, we’ve been told that it was only possible to replace it, rehabilitation was not an option. I’ve come to once again question that official position.”

Richardson was one of half dozen speakers at a rally at the bridge on May 19, organized by Glenn Pontier, who resigned from the bridge design committee because the committee refused to entertain the option of rehabilitation the existing historic 1904 structure.

Among those who spoke in favor of preserving the bridge was Nadia Rajsz, supervisor of the Town of Lumberland, in which the New York side of the bridge is located. She said she talked to Senator John Bonacic the previous day, and he said he is weighing in with the New York Department of Transportation (DOT) to pull the $4.75 million earmarked for the project, because he sees it as a waste of taxpayer money.

Assemblywoman Aileen Gunther was on hand and said that she too is weighing with DOT. She noted that the bridge’s other name is the All Veterans Memorial Bridge, and she said she had never heard of a veterans memorial being torn down.

At this point the future of the bridge is unclear. According to a report from Laurie Ramie, the acting executive director of the Upper Delaware Council, at the annual meeting of the New York-Pennsylvania Joint Interstate Bridge Commission (JIBC), on May 16 in Binghamton, the commission voted to move forward with the project, but the $4.75 million due from New York is unfunded at this point.

Pontier is hoping the campaign to save the bridge goes viral. He used the event to announce another rally scheduled for August 4, to raise awareness about the issue. He hopes to attract a flotilla of canoes and kayaks to stretch from one side of the river to the other to illustrate the length of the causeway that they say will be built to facilitate the replacement of the bridge, which they say, will block the flow of the river for up to two years.

The bridge WE use on a DAILY BASIS

All, but ALL, of the energy being generated to save the bridge comes from people who enjoy its aesthetic but do not NEED it to get to home. Having lived here (and there are way more than the '12' of us popularly but falsely asserted) for 20+ years, I have followed the bridge saga from an intensely necessary perspective. PennDOT has taken decades to wade through incredible paperwork and interminable studies to see what was feasible for us to have safe passage home.

I was once also in favor of saving the then beautiful bridge. Unfortunate but true, it has now deteriorated to such an extent that PennDOTs assertion that replacement is the viable alternative is an obviously sound one. Studies as to all alternatives have gone on for over two decades. Now that action is finally to happen it seems people who do not live there nor need the bridge would like to go back to square one.

For 20+ years we have had no fire nor other emergency services. Currently we cannot even get winter heating oil delivered and must carry it in the backs of our cars on public roads. Horror accident waiting to happen with a simple rear end collision. This matter is urgent and I pray that the fully considered actions for replacing the bridge move forward before there is a truly dire event that makes everyone regret their delays and quibbles.

Yes, the bridge was cool, I surely thought that when i bought my home way back when. Now it is unsafe and a nightmare. I would wonder who would give up their modern car and ride in a buggy behind a horse because it is 'historical' and 'charming'. I suspect not one of you who is against a new bridge for us. I would not wish any of this on any of you who drive into your driveways, happy to arrive home and never considering what a pleasure and blessing that actually is.