Greetings from Berkeley

By LAURIE STUART

If there is one lesson that I have learned these past four months as a seminary student it’s that things are rarely as simple as they seem on the surface. I learned this time and again, as I would form a quick assessment of something, only to find that opinion changed by information that I would learn the following week.

I continually reminded myself that what I did not understand was much larger than what I did.

While that was helpful to reel in my spinning mind, the most profound learning occurred when a visiting professor instructed my class to “acknowledge complexities.”

I felt immediately that that was my key to stop myself from seeking simplistic answers. I also realized in that moment that acknowledging complexities got me past dualistic thinking that set one reality against another.

Take holidays as an example.

Holidays are a great time to gather with friends and family. Holidays are stressful times that consume much time and energy. Holidays are times that we celebrate what is sacred in our lives. Holidays are secular occasions that have become too commercialized.

When we have to choose just one of these realities, we find ourselves in conflict with ourselves, and others, because we know that several of these concepts are true.

One key to navigating our way through our conflicting feelings is to allow those realities to exist in congruence with each other. By embodying the complexity, we move ourselves beyond trying to figure out which one is correct, and open ourselves up to thinking about whether we want to change our relationship to our situation. Rather than announcing that we simply “hate the holidays” because we are so conflicted about them, we might be able to consider ways to enhance our time with family by developing new holiday traditions. We might take a look at how we can make sure that we take care of ourselves and avoid holiday burnout. We might consider a special spiritual practice or ritual to make our holiday more sacred, and we might figure out how to cut back on our monetary expenditures and give more from the heart.

Getting beyond dualistic thinking offers us the possibility of making decisions and setting priorities. It also offers us the opportunity to understand that other people around us make different decisions based on their own priorities.

When we change our perspective from either/or to and/both thinking, we are presented with many more choices and possibilities. Ironically, we find that things get a whole lot simpler.

When we think about exploring the differences we find in the many interpretations of events in our world and acknowledge complexity, we find creative ways to explore the serious problems-environmental degradation, shrinking natural resources, institutionalized racism, classism and the crisis of our national identity, economy and moral values-that face our world.

We find a means to come together and communicate.

Through acknowledging complexity, we find connection, hope, possibility and perhaps even joy in successfully maneuvering through our troubled world.

Peace, shalom, salaame, right on, namaste, happy holidays and greetings from Berkeley.

(Publisher Laurie Stuart is a first-year student at the Starr King School for the Ministry, a Unitarian-Universalist seminary in Berkeley, CA.)






Dr. Punnybone



A Sign of The Times

Letters to the Editor

[EDITOR'S NOTE: The River Reporter welcomes letters on all subjects from its readers. They must be signed and include the correspondent's phone number. The correspondent's name and town will appear at the bottom of each letter; titles and affiliations will not, unless the correspondent is writing on behalf of a group.

Letters are printed at the discretion of the editor. It is requested they be limited to 300 words; correspondents may be asked to cut longer letters. Deadline is 1:00 p.m. on Monday.

Letters can be sent by e-mail to editor@riverreporter.com]


Curbing teen auto fatalities will require some creative thinking

To the editor:

I just arrived home from the forum at Monticello High School regarding teenage driving fatalities. There’s a lot of information, statistics, neat little electronic microchips and a video.

This is great, bringing together the community for a discussion about an important topic. But now it’s time to make some radical changes in the law. It’s time to switch gears from talk to action.

Here are some of my suggestions:

1. Drivers Education should become mandatory for graduation.

2. Instead of one semester, every other day, it should become a two-year course.

3. The curriculum should be changed to meet the needs of driving situations, skills, and changes in driver behavior.

4. Teens should be able to get their permits at 16 years old, but limited to being in the car with only their parents or a driving instructor.

(continue)