|
Seniors respond to rising costs of prescription drugs…and
other health care concerns
By RICHARD
A. ROSS
NARROWSBURG, NY — The cost of prescription drugs is spiraling
out of control. For seniors, many of whom are on fixed incomes, this issue
is particularly significant. According to PA Representative Jerry Birmelin
(R-139) “the cost of prescription drugs is rising faster than any other component
of health care—as much as 20 percent by recent estimates.”
Medicare does not currently cover the cost of prescription
drugs and some medications can cost hundreds of dollars per month. In order
not to pay these costs out of pocket, a number of seniors rely on supplementary
insurance. That supplemental insurance is obtained in one of two ways.
A segment of former employees from the public or private sector
have insurance as part of their retirement packages. On the other hand, many
people worked their whole lives and did not retire with these benefits. These
people have had to purchase supplementary insurance from HMOs that can be
quite costly.
There are those people who simply do not have any supplemental
insurance at all.
“There are countless people in the towns of Highland and Lumberland
who can’t afford food because they have to pay for their medication,” said
Joe Carr, a Lumberland Town Board member.
Although there are programs such as food stamps or the Elderly
Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC), Carr and members of the Western
Sullivan AARP group that met at the Colonial in Yulan on June 17 agreed that
some people are reluctant to seek help.
“They don’t want to feel as if they are on welfare even though
they worked hard all their lives and are entitled to assistance,” Carr said.
EPIC assists over 310,000 seniors in New York State.
If a person is 65 or older and has an income of less than
$35,000 or less if single, or $50,000 or less if married, he or she is eligible
for cost sharing for prescription drugs. Seniors can call 800/332-3742 for
information on EPIC or go to www.health.state.ny/nysdoh/epic/faq.htm on the
Internet.
In Pennsylvania, seniors can get help under the PACE or PACENET
programs. Under the revised legislation just passed by the State House
and under consideration by the State Senate, the new annual income limits
for
PACE will be $14,500 for singles and $17,500 for married couples. In
addition, the PACENET program increases limits to $22,500 for individuals
and $30,500
for married couples. Contact Rep. Birmelin’s office at 717/787-3993
for additional information.
Currently, legislation is being considered by Congress to
amend the Medicare program under a bill entitled the Prescription Drug and
Medicare Improvement Act. While most people would agree that some form of
government help with the rising costs of prescription drugs is long overdue,
a number of local seniors have doubts about what that might mean for them.
Those concerns were echoed by Senator Hillary Clinton in a phone news conference
on June 19. Senator Clinton raised some serious concerns about the version
of the bill just released by the House of Representatives.
Susan and Mack Morley of Glen Spey are retired from Minisink
Valley Schools and Mid Hudson Psychiatric Hospital respectively. They expressed
concerns that the proposed legislation could cause them to lose the coverage
they now have. Currently they have the Empire Plan and Indecs Insurance and
are unsure about how their benefits might be altered or limited by the proposed
legislation.
“People should not lose what benefits they have from their
jobs. Any changes should be grandfathered in.”
Mildred Huberman of the Town of Highland echoed those concerns.
“I have General Health Insurance and Medicare and pay only
$20 per prescription. I paid for these benefits by virtue of working all
those years,” said Huberman, who was a supervisor of guidance. She would
prefer that things be left the way they are.
“It all depends on the kind of job you had,” said Ann Danuff
of Lumberland. “Plenty of people worked hard but never received those kinds
of benefits.”
Therese McGowan of Highland Lake raised a serious question.
“Why do drugs cost so much less in Canada?” Carol O’Neill,
president of the Lumberland Seniors Club, confirmed the idea that Americans
take advantage of the lower drug prices north of the border. She is retired
from her job at Bon Secours Hospital where she worked in the emergency room.
“American doctors fax prescriptions to Canadian doctors. This
is especially true in Florida which has a large senior population.” O’Neill
also indicated that there is a high markup on drugs, some of which are
produced inexpensively and sold at a great profit.
Danuff heads up the local AARP group.
“It’s not so much a question of lowering the costs of drug
per person as it is to lower the cost of drugs in general. There’s a lot
of experimentation that is unnecessary.”
Joe McDonald of Yulan said the issue of prescription drug
costs was a particular sore point for veterans. A Vietnam veteran, McDonald
spoke about a class action lawsuit that has been brought against the government
for reneging on a promise made to servicemen who had spent at least twenty
years in the military. After World War II, the government assured veterans
that they would be covered for health care and prescription drugs for life.
After Vietnam, the government rescinded those benefits.
“Approximately 1,100 World War II vets die each day,” said
McDonald. “Despite huge increases in the military budget, the veterans have
been left out in the cold.”
When it comes to resolving the issues surrounding prescription
drugs, the challenge is to find an equitable solution to the great disparity
that currently exists between those who have coverage and those who don’t.
In addition, something must be done to bring the costs of prescription drugs
into line. Given the fact that many seniors depend on a number of these drugs,
the current situation of spiraling costs is clearly unacceptable.
Senator Clinton expresses reservations about the Prescription
Drug and Medicare Improvement Act
During the course of a telephone news conference held on June
19, Senator Clinton raised some reservations about the version of the Prescription
Drug and Medicare Improvement Act drafted by the House of Representatives.
According to Clinton, the recently passed Child Tax Credit bill served as
a wake-up call to the Senate on how legislation can be altered in its final
form. That bill which purports to afford millions of low-income working families
with tax credit for children actually was passed without a Senate provision
that would have included close to 12 million children from such families
who will now receive no benefit whatsoever from the final bill.
In reference to the proposed prescription drug legislation,
Clinton cited the following issues as problematic:
- The legislation would exclude lower income
people who are Medicaid/Medicare eligible. More than 219,000 New
Yorkers in this
category would lose their benefits. More than 10 percent of these people
are seniors.
- Upwards of 365,000 retirees who are currently
insured by programs offered by their former employers could lose
their current
benefits if the House version of the bill were to be enacted.
- More than 317,000 people enrolled in the New
York State EPIC program would lose their guaranteed assistance. Their
fate would
be determined by state budgets on a year-to-year basis. A significant
number
of these people have disabilities or are in nursing facilities.
- In total, more than 1/3 of the seniors would
be excluded from coverage. Senator Clinton brought a letter from
Governor George
Pataki to the Senate requesting that the EPIC program be protected.
The bill wouldn’t go into effect until 2006. In the interim,
seniors would be given a discount card to take to the pharmacy.
Many employers that have offered insurance to their retirees
that cover prescription drugs would opt to no longer do so. This could leave
many retirees scrambling for ways to pay for rising drug costs.
|