[EDITOR'S
NOTE: The River Reporter welcomes letters on all subjects
from its readers. They must be signed and include
the correspondent's phone number. The correspondent's
name and town will appear at the bottom of each letter;
titles and affiliations will not, unless the correspondent
is writing on behalf of a group.
Letters
are printed as they are received, or at the discretion
of the editor, and without correction to grammar or
spelling. It is requested they be limited to 500 words;
correspondents may be asked to cut longer letters.
Deadline is 1:00 p.m. on Monday.
Letters
can be sent by e-mail to editor@riverreporter.com]
|
To the editor:
I’d like to think the results of a TRR Online Poll, published in your December 12-16 edition, are not representative
of your readership! When asked to name the “greatest U.S. disaster of all
time” the second and third most votes (after a more-understandable “September
11”) went to “the Clinton Administration” and “the current Bush Administration.”
I’d like to think such short-sighted politicization was meant as a joke (however
disgruntled).
Though in his final year, Clinton brought out the worst in
everybody, his administration had a commendable record of accomplishment.
And yes, dreadful as much as Bush policy is, America will survive it.
But what is truly alarming is the fact that none of your poll
respondents came up with the only obvious answer: our Civil War. Though it
might be said to have been inevitable, this conflagration, pitting neighbor
against neighbor and brother against brother, nearly tore this great nation
asunder, and killed more Americans than any other conflict—including World
War II! Perhaps your voters need a refresher course in U.S. history.
The vote confirms my view that the Internet rarely brings
out the best in people; they seem more inclined to show themselves as idiots
when all it involves is an on-line click. If they had to write or type their
opinion, check it over for spelling, punctuation—and sense!—then commit it
to the mails in an envelope to address and stamp, they’d be less like to
voice such flippant, ridiculous views.
Alfred Lees
Callicoon, NY
To the editor:
Hey! Did you hear? President Pinocchio is immediately air
lifting into Iraq “weapons of mass destruction” as the hysterical White House
speech writers call the biological and chemical agents which Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld sold to Saddam Hussein in 1983. President Pinocchio
is determined to find offensive weapons, as they used to be called, before
moralists started to write presidential speeches. President Pinocchio is
going to be very sad if he can’t bomb Iraq and kill 200,000 Iraqis as his
daddy used to do.
Unlike his wife, President Pinocchio hasn’t killed anyone
yet, although the clone president did order the execution of Timothy James
McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber. By order of President Pinocchio and Attorney
General Ashcroft who lost an election to a dead politician, Timothy James
McVeigh was legally assassinated on June 11, 2001. This date was exactly
three months to the day and hour before September 11, 2001. Do you think
the “terrorists” knew this? Hmm. Brother self-sacrificing bombers.
President Pinocchio and his puppeteers are afraid they are
going to lose the election of 2004. They need to get a war going somewhere
soon. Did President Pinocchio provoke North Korea? Do politicians influence
other nations to attack? If there wasn’t a U.S. naval base on Pearl Harbor,
there wouldn’t have been December 7.
Joseph Edward Vallely
Washington Glen, CT
To the editor:
The pastor of the Calkins Baptist Church is a voice crying
in the wilderness. Where are all the conservative Christians in this area
that allow this nonsense (about Islam being a “peaceful religion”) to go
undisputed? Jesus came to proclaim truth. Are we going to give up truth to
be accepted in this “politically correct” community?
Paul Weyrich, a longtime conservative political force in Washington,
has coauthored an essay called “Why Islam is a Threat to America and the
West.” In it he quotes extensively from the Koran and rebuts the president’s
contention that this “great religion” is mostly peaceful: “The real nature
of Islam is a religion of war and conquest. Those who argue that the threat
comes only from ‘Islamic Fundamentalism’ or ‘Islamic extremism’ misportray
the nature of Islam itself. War against the unbeliever is as central a doctrine
and practice of Islam as the Virgin Birth, the Trinity, and Christ’s resurrection
are central to Christianity. Islam cannot abandon jihad and remain Islam.
The word Islam, does not mean peace, it means submission.”
More Christians are being martyred today than at the height
of the Roman persecutions, and “most of them are dying at the hands of Islam.”
One can sympathize with the dilemma faced by President Bush.
He needs some cover in the Muslim world in order to prosecute the war on
terrorism. But he also needs to forearm Americans by warning them about the
intentions of our enemies. The president should consider calling for “moderate”
Muslims to clean up their own house. Such demands are being made by Roman
Catholic laity on their hierarchy in the wake of priests alleged to have
sexually abused children. The president should ask Muslim political and theological
leaders to go after their own, if they are, indeed, misrepresenting “true”
Islam. Pressuring “responsible” Muslim leaders to police their own house
will help in two ways. If they do it, it will demonstrate there are true
moderates who believe in pluralism and tolerance. If they don’t, it will
expose their real motives. Peaceful? Prove it!
Linda Hensz
Milanville, PA
|