|
For more than a quarter of a century,
he was the voice for the Town of Hancock in the Upper
Delaware Valley. A big man with work-hardened large
hands and a face that had seen more of the outdoors
than indoors, George Frosch epitomized the last of
the independent landowners who made a hardscrabble
living off the land. He relished his role as the spokesperson
for private property rights and defended his point
of view enthusiastically through words and physical
action.
When he flashed his toothy smile and
crinkled his eyes at the corners, it was impossible
to anticipate whether the response would be a witty
quip to something being said or the revelation of
the darker side of his nature just below the surface.
Love him or hate him, you couldn’t ignore him.
George’s involvement in the creation
of the Upper Delaware legislation goes back to the
days of the early 70s when the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
(BOR) study flowed from the original Wild and Scenic
Rivers Act of 1968. He was an organizer and spokesperson
for one of the earliest Upper Delaware River township
associations that exerted a great influence on the
study and shape of the Upper Delaware legislation.
He enjoyed telling the story of guaranteeing the safety
of bureau representative Red Arnold as he made his
speaking rounds in the valley.
George was one of the original members
of the Upper Delaware Citizens Advisory Council as
a representative from Delaware County and the Town
of Hancock. His presence on that body was sometimes
contentious as he aggressively pursued his private
property rights agenda. When the fledgling Council
of Upper Delaware Townships first flexed its wings,
George departed the Citizens Advisory Council to assume
a leadership role in that body, which metamorphosed
into the present UDC. Wherever George was, that’s
where the action was and he relished every minute
of it.
George’s research into private
property rights often clashed with the “official”
version put forth by the New York State DEC representative
during the preparation and implementation of the River
Management Plan. He never gave an inch on his contention
that the original Hardenburgh Patent granted riparian
landowners more rights than the state was willing
to concede. At several meetings and seminars on the
subject, George would counter the state’s land
ownership experts with a fistful of documentation
of his own. In the end, his point of view, that the
ownership rights to the land were established from
the high water mark to the center of the river, would
prevail as the state conceded that ownership was dependent
on the individual deed emanating from the Hardenburg
Patent.
George was also quick to assert his
rights whenever an unwary boater or fisherman would
appear on the river between his own Frisbee Island
and the river channel that flowed between it and his
Kilgore Switch farm. He was known to wave a pistol
now and then to emphasize his case with recalcitrant
visitors who disputed his claim.
George was a driving force behind the
replacement of the Lordville Bridge and I will always
remember the scene at its dedication as citizens from
New York and Pennsylvania led by George and Chris
Wallingford, his Pennsylvania counterpart, met in
the middle of the bridge and shook hands.
George and his old pickup truck with
his black Lab “Buddy” in the passenger
seat were a familiar sight in Narrowsburg for many
years on UDC meeting nights. He was one of the last
of the original citizen volunteers who shaped the
Upper Delaware’s future and helped to strike
a balance between the national interest and private
property rights while at the same time preserving
the values that make the Upper Delaware a treasured
addition to the Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
He will be missed.
|