|
[EDITOR'S
NOTE: The River Reporter welcomes letters on all subjects
from its readers. They must be signed and include
the correspondent's phone number. The correspondent's
name and town will appear at the bottom of each letter;
titles and affiliations will not, unless the correspondent
is writing on behalf of a group.
Letters
are printed as they are received, or at the discretion
of the editor, and without correction to grammar or
spelling. It is requested they be limited to 500 words;
correspondents may be asked to cut longer letters.
Deadline is 1:00 p.m. on Monday.
Letters
can be sent by e-mail to editor@riverreporter.com]
To the editor:
I am writing in reference to The River
Reporter’s August 22nd issue, specifically the
Today’s Business article “ Not Enough
Houses, Not Enough Builders.” I applaud The
River Reporter’s attempt to address and bring
to the table important issues affecting our community,
but was disappointed in the reporter’s failure
to capture the essential issues concerning building
and future growth. I take this opportunity to clarify
my position on building costs and reiterate the importance
of comprehensive zoning and communication between
townships within the region.
First off, building costs in our area
are in the vicinity of $125/square foot for a mid-range
custom home, not $75/sq. ft. Builders in Sullivan
County are subject to the same material and labor
cost increases as the rest of the country and you
can no longer build for $75/sq. foot as was possible
fifteen years ago. I believe that clients need to
be educated to understand the increased expenses.
It is also interesting to note that in most metropolitan
areas custom building costs can be as high as $250/sq.ft.
People, who build custom homes here, are really getting
a great deal, though I do not believe they are “stealing”
as was quoted.
The second clarification I think is
important to make has to do with area zoning issues.
I do not have any “dark prediction of casino
workers sticking modulars on the edges of large fields.”
Though, I do believe that with the new potential for
Sullivan County receiving a large influx of population
(i.e. the future performance center and possibility
of gambling) each township must reassess their zoning
regulations. A more comprehensive zoning plan should
be established linking each of the town’s plans
together. This would have to be studied at a county
level, with expert zoning consultants helping to analyze
the individual town plans and how they relate with
neighboring towns. Zoning wise the county needs to
be thought of as a whole, rather than individual autonomous
sections. A synergetic understanding of the town relationships
is necessary. Certainly the uniqueness of character
and needs of each town must be respected, but a larger
picture is beginning to evolve and preparation for
it is essential. Possibly a forum addressing only
county-wide zoning would be a worthy topic on which
The River Reporter could focus.
Michael Chojnicki, R.A.
The Beechwoods, NY
To the editor:
We were pleased to see former Upper
Delaware Superintendent John Hutzky’s thoughtful
Op Ed piece added to your coverage of this summer’s
two drownings in the Delaware River. By his count,
as the brave and the foolish continue to swim back
and forth across the river, at least six private or
public agencies with overlapping jurisdictions and
conflicting mandates have made little progress toward
the development of remedies to reduce the risks of
river swimming to visitors. Human nature meets government
gridlock and the potential for another tragedy remains
constant.
We urge the National Park Service to
enlarge and energize its river safety committee through
the inclusion of the NYS Department of Conservation,
the U.S. Coast Guard, the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat
Commission and qualified individuals—John Hutzky
tops our list—and to lead this committee toward
the development of a comprehensive mechanism which
reduces the number of drownings in the Upper Delaware
to an irreducible minimum—zero.
Grace and Thomas L. Hoffman
Branchville, NJ
To the editor:
I want to thank Dave Hulse and the
newspaper for keeping us up to date on issues as they
come up and are discussed at the town board meetings,
as was done in his recent brief article about our
tax situation. I’d like to see the same coverage
for the Tusten Zoning Board of Appeals and the Tusten
Planning Board. Public hearings must be posted by
law in the legal notices, but most of us don’t
have the time and patience to scan the legals every
week. It seems like the newspaper is filling a real
need in the community by informing us of what is under
discussion by our boards.
Susan Sullivan
Lava, NY
To the editor:
Sullivan County Tobacco Free Coalition
supports and applauds Mayor Bloomberg and the New
York City Council in their effort to provide all New
York City workers with a safe, healthy, smoke free
work environment, all workers (including office, restaurant,
bar, bingo, bowling and nightclub workers) as well
as patrons of, deserve a safe, healthy, smoke free
environment. No one, in any job, should have to breathe
tobacco smoke pollution when it has been shown to
cause cancer and respiratory disease. The health of
bartenders and wait staff is just as important as
the health of any other employee. Bartenders and wait
staff are being forced to breathe what is equal to
half a pack of cigarettes a day in secondhand smoke
and that is just not fair.
Bravo to more and more community decision
makers here in Sullivan County who are realizing that
no one should have the legal right to make someone
else physically sick. Many agencies, organizations
and some restaurants here in Sullivan County have
already voluntarily created smoke free environments
to insure that their employees and patrons are provided
a healthy environment.
We encourage the Sullivan County decision
makers to follow Mayor Bloomberg’s lead and
provide a healthy environment for all Sullivan County
patrons and workers.
Jaye Johnson, CSW
Coordinator, Sullivan County Tobacco Free Coalition
Monticello, NY
|