|
‘Signs’ runs crop circles
around the competition
One of the rarities of the modern cinema
is the ability to create tension. All too often, giant
explosions and tepid car chases take the place of
real tension. All of a sudden, we are hit with the
taut, well-written “Signs.” With a deceptively
subtle approach, “Signs” blindsides the
audience by showing them what they do not expect.
Graham Hess (Mel Gibson) is a farmer
living in Bucks County, PA with his children, Morgan
(Rory Culkin) and Bo (Abigail Breslin) and his brother
Merrill (Joaquin Pheonix). The family can best be
described as the result of broken dreams. Graham was
a priest only six months ago; a tragic car accident
that claimed his wife also destroyed his faith, and
now he becomes uneasy when people still refer to him
as “Father.” Merrill was a star of Minor
League Baseball and still holds a few records, including
one for most strikeouts at bat. One morning, Graham
is shocked to find crop circles emblazoned on his
cornfield. The next day, hundreds of such circles
appear all over the world. Over the next few nights,
Graham and Merrill try to figure out what the odd
sounds emanating from the field are. They’re
not sure, but there is one certainty. Something strange
is here and there are more strange things to come.
Director M. Night Shyamalan (of the
good but overrated “The Sixth Sense”)
seems to take a page right out of Hitchcock’s
book for “Signs.” Characters and plot
details are only revealed when they’re absolutely
necessary and even when they are shown to us, we always
feel like there’s something missing. It’s
all meant to milk the greatest possible suspense from
the audience and it’s always successful. I spent
nearly three-fourths of the running time literally
on the edge of my seat.
“Signs” cannot be labeled with one
genre. The film contains elements of horror, science
fiction, mystery, drama and even humor. Only the most
accomplished films could possibly handle that many
elements. In that light, “Signs” plays out like some
sort of a mad juggler, throwing around not only these
factors, but also the audience and their expectations.
“Signs” defies description, demanding
that one should see it to even begin to appreciate
it. I give “Signs” the highest recommendation one
can possibly give. It’s frightening, it’s entertaining
and most importantly, it will stay in your mind for
a long time to come.
|