|
[EDITOR'S
NOTE: The River Reporter welcomes letters on all subjects
from its readers. They must be signed and include
the correspondent's phone number. The correspondent's
name and town will appear at the bottom of each letter;
titles and affiliations will not, unless the correspondent
is writing on behalf of a group.
Letters
are printed as they are received, or at the discretion
of the editor, and without correction to grammar or
spelling. It is requested they be limited to 500 words;
correspondents may be asked to cut longer letters.
Deadline is 1:00 p.m. on Monday.
Letters
can be sent by e-mail to editor@riverreporter.com]
To the editor:
Your May 16-22 edition contains a front-page
story written by Tom Kane and a letter to the editor
written by Robert Sturdevant, which disseminates timely
false information to readership headed to a May 21
election.
Sturdevant’s letter claims that a BOCES
study shows an increase in student enrollment during
the next 10 years. For the record, state law requires
a school district to provide proof that the construction
of new space is necessary. One component of that proof
is the submission of a 10-year enrollment projection
by a certified engineer. The enrollment study that
was officially submitted to the Department of Education
for the SW building projects shows a projected enrollment
decrease of 20 percent over the next 10 years.
The sub-headline of Kane’s story, “Candidate
asks the Board of Regents to withhold building aid,”
is categorically untrue. Nowhere in the body of a
letter that I wrote to the Board of Regents do I make
such an absurd request.
My letter, and a similar one that was
sent to Commissioner Mills, prompted an investigation
which has now clearly and incontrovertibly established
that the sole purpose of the renovation of our existing
buildings and the construction of a fourth building,
is to accommodate the educational needs and expense
of the industrial growth of the eastern side of Sullivan
County—specifically casino gambling.
Our community has continuously been
asked to make financial and academic sacrifices for
these construction projects. Contrary to Kane’s inaccurate
account of my letter or intentions, the response to
my inquiry to State Rd. has clarified the true purpose
of the merger, the building projects and for whom
our sacrifices are being made.
The timing of the printing of such
inaccurate information challenges the journalistic
integrity of your newspaper.
Arthur Norden
Callicoon, NY
To the editor:
The Sullivan West at Narrowsburg Parent
Teacher Student Organization would like to thank the
following businesses for their support of Staff Appreciation
Week. The businesses are: Milanville General Store,
One Stop Hardware, Carini’s Pizza, Lakeview Luncheonette,
Pete’s Pub, Heinle’s, Jeffersonville Bank, Cochecton
Oil, Callicoon Theater, Tom’s Bait and Tackle, Landers
River Trips, Gasko & Meyer, Napa, Big Eddy Diner,
Kathy’s Beauty Salon, Narrowsburg Motors, Pizza Hut,
Brown Eyed Susan’s Gift Shop, Charlie’s Barber Shop,
Beach Lake Pizza, The River Reporter, Pecks Market
and Rasmussen’s Furniture.
It is only with their support that
we are able to continue to make our school a great
place.
We’d like to once again, thank them
for another successful Staff Appreciation Raffle.
Lisa Lander, Staff Appreciation Week
Chairman
Sullivan West P.T.S.O. at Narrowsburg
To the editor,
Many good people in our community have
become victims of manipulative practices by Geisinger
Health Plan. They received letters advising them to
discontinue their association with Wayne Memorial
Hospital and its network of physicians because Geisinger
will no longer pay for services they receive locally.
It is true that Wayne Memorial Hospital
notified Geisinger of its intention to terminate its
contract with the health plan. This was done in order
to bring Geisinger to the negotiating table and to
compel Geisinger to pay claims on time, according
to state law. However, Geisinger has continued to
violate the law with its late payments, refused to
negotiate in good faith and now is both threatening
and frightening our patients, neighbors and friends
with termination of services.
We wish to assure our community that
your physicians and hospital will not abandon you.
We will not allow Geisinger to force you to commute
many miles for healthcare services we can provide
locally.
The local physicians and Wayne Memorial
Hospital are prepared to negotiate with Geisinger.
These negotiations are not about charging more or
getting paid more than our current contract provides.
They are about receiving fair compensation in the
appropriate and legal time frame, so that we can continue
to operate at reasonable rates and pay our own bills
in a timely manner.
We ask you to call Geisinger at 800/447-4000.
Tell them you are a citizen of this community and
that you expect to receive your medical services here.
Tell them you care about your health and safety and
you have the right to receive quality care from the
doctors and hospital you trust we know count on us.
Jon K. Sternburg, M.D., Vice President,
Upper Delaware Area Physician Association
Narrowsburg, NY
To the editor:
On Thursday, January 17, at the Sullivan
County Legislature’s General Services Committee meeting,
the subject of how to retain the young, quality people
in Sullivan County was broached again. The outcome
of this meeting was summed up by Legislature chair
Rusty Pomeroy who is reported to have said “There
are inequities in the system. We should do a survey
on salaries. Maybe we can reach out to Ulster County.
They did a similar thing.” Which reminds me of a story
I read a long time ago.
Once upon a time, a long time ago,
in a place not too far from here, a group of reportedly
wise men would meet for lunch every day. They would
discuss issues of wide range over their mid-day meal
and each would offer the input of their great wisdom.
A young lad who was hired as a “broom-pusher” would
listen intently, for he wished to become educated
and hoped someday to be as wise as these men.
The question on this particular day
was, “How many teeth are in a horse’s mouth?” Each
wise man, in turn, had to admit that he did not know
the answer. They all agreed to research the matter,
using their great intelligence and great books and
to come back on the morrow with the answer.
As agreed, the men gathered for their
mid-day meal and each had to profess that they had
done diligent research on the question, but had been
unable to find the answer. They agreed to try again
and to approach the question once more the next day.
Alas, to the chagrin of all, each and
every one had to admit they could not answer the question
as to the number of teeth in a horse’s mouth. They
agreed that this was a question that could not be
answered and would remain one of the great mysteries
of the universe.
At this point, the young lad, who had
been listening with great interest to the on-going
debate, spoke up in a faint voice. “Why don’t you
go out to the stable and count the teeth in the horse’s
mouth?” Instead of taking this most obvious suggestion,
the group of wise men all rose up from their seats
as one, took the young lad by the back of the neck
and threw him out of the room.
Getting back to the question of why
young people leave Sullivan County, the most obvious
source of the answers would be to ask the young people.
Send a questionnaire to each school and ask the young
people. Of course, we could ask a chicken why it crosses
the road. Or, of course, since Rusty Pomeroy is leaving
Sullivan County, we could ask him and apply his answer
to the reason why young people leave Sullivan County.
Sondra Bauernfeind
Mongaup Valley, NY
To the editor:
Taxes—taxes—taxes!
Here is another issue. What will happen
to the tax base of the properties within a one-or-two-mile
area of the proposed foam factory if it comes or another
factory that might be a polluter to the area of White
Mills?
If there is a 12-year free base tax
to the buyer, will the surrounding properties get
their taxes lowered, because of the value of the properties
going downhill?
What happens if county and school district
taxes are lowered for properties of less value; would
the other property owners have their taxes raised
to make up for the lowered taxes and the 12-year tax-free
businesses?
The Palmyra Township Supervisors of
Wayne County never thought of that when they were
in their rush to please the Lackawaxen Honesdale Shippers
Association, WIDCO and the Wayne County Chamber of
Commerce; taxes—taxes—taxes!
Jim Bader
White Mills, PA
To the editor:
Lately many local newspaper articles
have centered on the proposed Flexible Foam Factory
in White Mills. As more of these articles unfold,
we wonder if the area business interests outweigh
the concern for the community’s well-being. Concerned
citizens asking pertinent questions at the township
meetings about preserving health, environment and
standard of living have been labeled as “an angry
mob.”
Being members of the audience, we cannot
see how the organized interaction that occurred can
be placed in such a category. Looking back on the
history of the United States, “an angry mob” constituted
actions that far exceeded voicing an opinion contradictory
to the business interests. Could this include the
1,064 individual signatures presented to the township
on April 22, 2002 against the proposed Flexible Foam
factory and such groups as the Green Party, High Sierra
Club, Lackawaxen River Conservancy, Lackawaxen supervisors
and Upper Delaware Council? In our opinion, we [the
community] are being asked to sacrifice our health
and way of life to ensure that the Lackawaxen Honesdale
Shippers Association can gain control of the railroad
from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
As we read through the sworn depositions
taken March 11, at the Palmyra Township meeting and
the DEP permit submitted by Flexible Foam on March
27, the inconsistencies between the two are very alarming.
Furthermore the high paying jobs this company would
bring is now reported to be approximately between
$7.50 to $9 an hour. Are the potential risks to our
economy, tourism, property values, waterways, air
quality and health worth a facility of this nature?
Recently an older couple stopped in
to talk about this issue. They asked why the Lackawaxen
Honesdale Shippers Association would bring such a
potentially harmful company to our area. They questioned
how the railroad could be in the dire when they believe
that the railroad receives an abundance of funding
in the form of grants. This conversation had us asking
many questions:
1. Does the railroad receive grants
or other forms of funding?
2. Is anyone in the nonprofit organizations
of WIDCO or the Lackawaxen Honesdale Shippers Association
collecting a salary, receiving benefits or gaining
compensation in any form?
3. Can the public, through an independent
party, review the financial situation of these nonprofit
organizations for the last 10 years?
4. When will another company like Flexible
Foam be sought out and where will it be placed in
our area?
Our economy is primarily tourist driven.
How many families will travel on the rail along the
Lackawaxen when factories with stacks, such as Flexible
Foam, are the highlights of the scenic tour? If we
truly want to preserve the tourism, economics and
train rides of this area, then the quality of the
area should be preserved. We believe that industrial
development along the railroad and the Lackawaxen
River will ultimately destroy both the economy and
railroad, leaving our area absent of both lucrative
jobs and a good quality of life.
Jamie Clark and James Mason
White Mills, PA
To the editor,
If leaping to unwarranted conclusions
were an Olympic event, B. Schorr would surely be a
serious contender. Mr. Schorr, in his undisciplined
harangue, in addition to missing the point, tells
us, incorrectly, what I admit, what it is that I wish,
who I embrace and then to imagine that I accuse and
threaten people.
The answer to what I surmise is his
central question, however, is simple. The study: “Business
Profitability vs. Social Profitability: Evaluating
Industries with Externalities, The Case of Casinos”
by Grinols and Mustard, that I refer to in citing,
“two dollars out, for each dollar the state may derive
from casinos,” is from a peer reviewed, professional,
journal, Managerial and Decision Economics, published
in 2001 which can be accessed at, unlike “studies”
paid for by gambling interests, a study published
in a peer-reviewed journal must be reviewed and accepted
by some of the best minds in economics.
Regarding the most egregious “misunderstanding”
Schorr expresses, I would point out that the eight
percent of casino patrons (that’s 8,000 people out
of 100,000). Those are people, Mr. Schorr, individual
personal tragedies, not just numbers, who contribute
40+ percent of casinos’ income are but the ones whose
symptoms warrant psychiatric classification. Too many
others make their own lives and the lives of others,
very difficult indeed. Which leads me to express,
once again, my primary reason for opposing casinos.
Respectable studies show that the problems associated
with casinos, including crimes—about eight percent
higher in counties with casinos—(Careful Mr. Schorr,
I can cite the source), not unexpectedly, are more
abundant the closer one lives to a casino.
I, for one, do not look forward to
my friends and neighbors becoming victims of increased
crime—or to paying for gamblers’ other problems—which
every single taxpayer in New York will do, if casinos
arrive. It is what The New York Times was referring
to in saying, “In the end, Mr. Pataki’s casinos will
cost New York far more than they could ever deliver...”
Perhaps that too is something Mr. Schorr considers
a threat. It is, rather, a clear-headed and credible
warning that should be carefully considered by each
of us.
Lee Karr
Forestburgh, NY
To the editor:
Happy Birthday, American Red Cross.
One hundred and twenty one years ago
this month, on May 21, 1881, a 60-year-old woman founded
the American Red Cross. Her name was Clara Barton
and she almost immediately redefined the Red Cross—initially
an impartial organization for the relief of military
wounded—by adding disaster relief to its services.
More than a century later, disaster
relief remains the hallmark of the American Red Cross.
Each year, the victims of more than 67,000 disasters
nationwide get help from some 1,000 Red Cross chapters
like ours.
Locally, in the past year, the Wayne
Pike Chapter has helped local families when they have
lost their homes due to fires and other natural disasters.
With the help of local volunteers, our goal is to
take care of the immediate needs of people affected
by fires, floods, tornadoes or other natural calamities—make
sure they have a temporary place to stay, food to
eat, clothes to wear so that they can go to work or
school and take the next steps forward.
All the assistance they receive is
free of charge, a gift from generous donors to our
Disaster Relief Fund. Help can’t wait for headlines;
we maintain this fund because we need to be able to
respond before we know whether or not we will receive
contributions for a particular disaster.
As the Red Cross celebrates its birthday,
we at the Wayne Pike Chapter want to thank all those
in our community to make this magnificent system of
neighbor helping neighbor possible, our wonderful
volunteers, our generous donors, the many local businesses
who support our efforts in so many ways and local
emergency services personnel who are often our partners
in help.
Keith Williams
Wayne Pike Chapter
American Red Cross Chairman
To the editor:
I wish to openly express opposition
to any blanket changes to the Town of Tusten zoning
laws. Our current zoning laws have been well established
for many years now. I believe that making arbitrary
and capricious changes to our zoning laws is unwarranted,
if not improper. To make such blanket changes to the
current zoning laws would result in changes to long
established land use practices and/or possibilities.
The suggested changes would condemn property usage
without compensation. We have established mechanisms
in place to control “sprawl,” enforcement of current
zoning laws through the building inspector, planning
board, zoning board, zoning board of appeals, and
the town board.
The proponents of zoning changes clearly
want to limit new investments and tax bases for our
town. As a resident for many years, I believe the
town should be doing more to encourage new businesses
and not looking to push them away. To make such wide
sweeping changes the few have voiced is wrong and
unjust.
Charles Hoffman
Narrowsburg, NY
|