|
[EDITOR'S
NOTE: The River Reporter welcomes letters on all subjects from its
readers. They must be signed and include the correspondent's phone
number. The correspondent's name and town will appear at the bottom
of each letter; titles and affiliations will not, unless the correspondent
is writing on behalf of a group.
Letters
are printed as they are received, or at the discretion of the editor,
and without correction to grammar or spelling. It is requested they
be limited to 500 words; correspondents may be asked to cut longer
letters. Deadline is 1:00 p.m. on Monday.
Letters
can be sent by e-mail to editor@riverreporter.com]
To the editor:
For anyone who missed it, I quote Sullivan County
Planning Commissioner Alan Sorensen’s piece in this newspaper’s
Today’s Business section (March 14 - 20) as he talked about the
challenges that large scale projects, like the performing arts center
and casinos, present: “Mishandled zoning decisions are the greatest
danger Sullivan is facing now.…” Sorensen said that “the temptation
is going to be to grant zoning changes and map amendments that allow
for the proliferation of new commercial activities on the periphery
of, or in traditional residential areas. Giving in to that is proliferation
of strip commercial development along the highway corridors that
exacerbates visual clutter and traffic congestion and, without intending
it, will encourage further disinvestment in traditional downtown
areas.” This, to me, expresses how most people who attending the
public hearing in the Town of Tusten on proposed changes to our
zoning law were feeling, and expresses it very well.
I also applaud Jeffrey Moore’s piece in this week’s
paper “Traffic and suburban sprawl: a foregone conclusion?”
In talking about the same Today’s Business section,
and the “foregone conclusion” of growth on a huge scale, he points
out, “the false notion that adding all this ratable tax base will
somehow hold or lower taxes is an old myth that has been thoroughly
disproved when the added costs of new schools (due to increased
population), and/or newer widened roads that need more maintenance
to accommodate more people, more fire and police costs more government
services of all kinds.… I hope no one will be surprised and shocked
to see the budgets soar and taxes go up.”
What can we do? At least keep the zoning we’ve
got.
Susan Sullivan
Narrowsburg, NY
To the editor:
Wishing doesn’t make it so. That old adage applies
to the inaccurate and erroneous editor’s note added to my letter
in the March 21 issue of The River Reporter. This addendum said,
“Effluent from the Cortese Landfill, a successfully cleaned up Superfund
site, flows downward and toward the river. According to the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the landfill does not pose any threat to
the students at the Sullivan West at Narrowsburg building.”
I realize Laurie Stuart and others have a great
emotional attachment to the present Narrowsburg School building,
but that doesn’t change the facts.
The Center for Health, Environment and Justice
in its January 2002 nationally distributed report listed the Narrowsburg
school as the only school building in Sullivan County located within
one half mile of a federal or state Superfund site. Their map of
Sullivan County specifically says, “Sites within half a mile of
schools can pose threats to students and teachers.”
A recent five-nation study published in the “Lancet,”
a major British medical journal, says there is an increased risk
of birth defects within 1.8 miles of a toxic waste site.
The Center for Health, Environment and Justice
stresses that young children are very susceptible to the environmental
toxins found near such sites which explains its concern about high
risk school locations.
The Golder Associates 1994 “Revised Phase III Remedial
Investigation Report, Cortese Landfill Site” states, “No core holes
have been drilled into the bedrock of the site.” This means we have
no definitive geological knowledge of how much contamination or
seepage may have penetrated the sedimentary rock substrata or how
far and in what direction it may have traveled.
The same report also states that, “There is not
enough data to assess seasonal or long term concentration trends.”
If the Cortese Superfund site were totally cleaned
up as Ms. Stuart claims, you would not need to cap the site or use
offset wells to test the ground water or monitor the site for the
next sixteen to thirty years. In fact, the design for the ground
water extraction/treatment system won’t be completed until mid 2002
at the earliest.
The most ominous indication that the five-acre
Cortese Superfund site is not cleaned up can be found in the 1994
United States Environmental Protection Agency Decision Summary.
This important government document says, “The selected
remedy treats hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants
at the site through both the drum removal and groundwater extraction
components of the selected remedy. Despite this, hazardous substances,
pollutants and contaminants will remain onsite above health based
levels as the entire Landfill mass itself cannot be effectively
excavated and treated because of its size.”
Laurie, you shouldn’t be playing dice with children’s
lives. Let us do the sensible thing and use the 4.8 million dollars
in renovation money to build a brand new “state of the art” school
on a safe piece of ground in the Narrowsburg area far away from
the Cortese Superfund site, or build an appropriate new annex at
Delaware Valley or Jeffersonville-Youngsville for the Narrowsburg
kids.
Would that be so terrible?
Noel van Swol
Long Eddy, NY
[Editor’s note: According
to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the organization responsible
for cleanup and monitoring the Cortese Landfill, the site does not
pose a threat to the population at the Narrowsburg school building.]
To the editor:
It happened to me once again. Enjoying lunch with
my wife in a local restaurant, we were talking between ourselves
in our native Ukrainian language. To our surprise a man at the next
table got up and nervously reminded us that we are in America and
should talk in English. Not taking him seriously, I explained to
him politely that nobody, including him, can stop me from using
the language that I want.
Yes, I’m in America. I’m a naturalized citizen,
but I’m also proud to be Ukrainian. It does not stop me from being
involved in the life of my community. Serving on one of the boards
in our town, I work closely with other people of different heritages:
German, Jewish, Ukrainian and native American. We all respect each
other. We all work for the betterment and growth of our community.
At my volunteer job, I closely work with a woman who is proud to
be of Italian heritage. There are no disagreements or objections
if, sometimes in conversation with her, I use Italian words (not
many of them are in my vocabulary).
As a naturalized American and proud Ukrainian by
birth, I greatly respect this country and I am fulfilling my obligations
as a citizen of this nation. It is my intention to remind this gentleman,
who annoyed me at the table in the restaurant, that this nation
is a conglomerate of the people of many different nations. Together
we make America great and strong.
Bohdan Kandiuk
Glen Spey, NY
To the editor:
I am faxing you a copy of a letter, which we received
on March 29, concerning the landing of emergency helicopters at
the Fawn Lake Forest ball field. This is only temporary until our
landing zone is rebuilt. When Fawn Lake Forest first built their
ball field, the then Board of Directors verbally agreed to allow
Central Volunteer Fire Department to land emergency-type helicopters
in their ball field. A few years later, we also obtained permission
from the Hillview Rod and Gun Club to use its field, which is adjacent
to the fire station, as a landing zone. This became our primary
landing zone so that we would not disturb and annoy the residents
of Fawn Lake with the loud noise of the helicopter.
The Central Volunteer Fire Department wants the
residents of Fawn Lake Forest Development to know how the current
Board of Directors is treating the volunteers of this community.
Many of the residents of Fawn Lake Development are members of both
the ambulance and/or the fire department and give selflessly of
themselves to help and protect their community and probably they
have no idea of the current situation. Imagine how you would feel
if one of your loved ones, good friend or even a neighbor had to
be airlifted to a hospital, but could not, due to your Board of
Directors not letting an emergency helicopter land on their property.
Thank you.
Fred Gelderman
Central Volunteer Fire Department member/Treasurer
[Editor’s
note: The following letter was sent to the Central Volunteer Fire
Department and the Lackawaxen Township Volunteer Ambulance Corp.]
Re: Helicopter Landing on Fawn Lake Property
To whom it may concern,
Please be advised that the law firm of Farley &
Bemathy, L.L.C, represents Fawn Lake Forest Association. Fawn Lake
has brought to my attention Central Volunteer Fire Department and
Lackawaxen Township Volunteer Ambulance Corp’s practice of permitting
the landing of helicopters on property located in Fawn Lake Forest.
Please be advised Fawn Lake Forest Association
does not condone the practice of permitting the landing of helicopters
on Fawn Lake property. Further, the individuals who land the helicopters
on Fawn Lake property shall assume all risks inherited in such activity.
Be advised that the landing of helicopters is not approved by the
Board of Directors. Further, this activity is strongly objected
to by the Board and may be in violation of the Restrictive Covenants.
Fawn Lake Forest therefore requests you immediately
terminate the landing of helicopters, or the contemplation of landing
of helicopters, on Fawn Lake property.
Please be guided accordingly.
Very truly yours,
Thomas F. Farley, Esq.
Hawley, PA
To the editor:
The Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York
would like to thank New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
and the Vitagrant review committee for selecting our organization
to receive $591,000, the second grant they awarded in the state.
The funds, from New York State’s $19 million share
in a vitamin price-fixing case, will be used toward our capital
campaign.
Nearly two million New Yorkers are hungry or at
risk of hunger; we are steadfast in our commitment to alleviate
this hunger. However, our existing facilities and trucks are strained
to capacity, so we recently launched a $3 million campaign to address
this challenge.
Since 1982, we have collected large donations of
food from the food industry and distributed it to our member agencies,
including soup kitchens, food pantries, emergency shelters, and
day care and senior programs. Demand for food has risen dramatically
in the last several years. When we began operation 20 years ago,
we distributed 400,000 pounds of food to 60 agencies in six counties.
Last year, we distributed more than 18 million pounds of food to
over 900 charitable organizations in 23 counties.
The support of Attorney General Spitzer has put
us well on the way to reaching our $3 million goal. We greatly appreciate
his commitment to alleviating hunger in New York State.
Mark Quandt
Executive Director Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York
Latham, NY
|