|
We Were Soldiers
in a Sub par Film
It appears that “Pearl Harbor” screenwriter Randall
Wallace is up to his old tricks again in “We Were Soldiers”, another
film based around a single battle in an American war. It mimics
“Platoon” and strives to be as significant as “Black Hawk Down”,
but fails to create the intensity and gravity of either of those
great motion pictures.
November 1965: After President Johnson’s decision
to increase the number of troops brought into Vietnam, Lt. Col.
Hal Moore (Mel Gibson), a devout family man, brings his battalion
to the Southeast personally. The battalion includes Moore’s right-hand
man, Sgt.-Maj. Basil Plumley, a hard-nosed, war-hardened officer,
Bruce Crandall (Greg Kinnear), a talented pilot, and Jack Geoghegan
(Chris Klein), recently a father. However, they are stationed in
the Ia Drang Valley, and they are quick to enter a long, heated
battle with the Viet Cong Army. The Americans are surrounded by
the enemy. Heavy casualties are expected; but they are determined
to fight their way through the troops. The company is soon joined
by Joe Galloway (Barry Pepper), a combat photographer who finds
himself caught in the middle. Meanwhile, back home, Hal’s wife Julie
(Madeleine Stowe) takes upon the thankless job of handing out telegrams
informing her friends around the neighborhood of the deaths of their
husbands.
“We Were Soldiers” does not provide us with the
sheer terror or emotional backlash of the Vietnam War. Vietnam is
a delicate subject that demands only the most detailed and compassionate
view, and instead of developing its characters in a way that we
can care about them, this film would rather employ a number of tired
film conventions, such as slow-motion when a character is killed.
The film is not daring by any means, and presents us with its points
in a somewhat pompous, self-important manner, as if we should be
surprised by what we’ve already heard.
There are a few bright spots, however. The lead
performances are strong, with Gibson, Elliott and Pepper at their
best (under the circumstances), giving each character the right
range of emotions. Also, the actors’ chemistry onscreen helps make
their dialogue interesting and believable.
My hopes for “We Were Soldiers” were very high,
perhaps unreasonably so. However, the movie refuses to be anything
more than a run-of-the-mill war flick filled with clichés, and should
be treated as such.
|
|
|