|
Scandal rocks society of priests
Sexual abuse charges made
By TOM KANE
SHOHOLA — Two priests of the Society of St. John,
a religious community dedicated to the traditional Catholic Latin
liturgy, have been temporarily removed from active priestly duties
by the Bishop of Scranton.
Allegations have been made that the priestly pair
sexually molested one youth, and perhaps others. The two priests,
Father Carlos Urrutigoity, Superior General of the Society of St.
John, and Father Eric Ensey, one of his advisors, were ordered to
leave St. John’s but to remain in the Scranton Diocese while an
investigation is conducted. The two priests were unavailable for
comment.
Action came after the diocese was contacted by
the Apostolic Nuncio in Washington, D.C., who had the name of the
victim who made allegations of sexual misconduct against the two
priests. The call to the nuncio was placed by the father of the
youth.
“We tried to reach the young
man and his family but were not very successful,” Auxiliary Bishop
John Dougherty of Scranton said. “At least they know that we are
ready to help. We will seek some kind of psychological assessment
of the accused, and assistance so that this kind of thing won’t
happen again,” he said.
In conformity with a diocesan policy, adopted a
few years ago to handle such incidents, the diocese first attempted
to assist the victim, and then to deal with the accused.
It is possible that the priests could be defrocked
(termed “laicization”), said Dougherty, although that conclusion
has not been reached.
“The diocese will maintain a primary concern for
the victim and his family,” said Dougherty. Bishop James Timlin,
the head of the diocese, was away and could not be reached.
The nuncio received his information largely through
the efforts of Dr. Jeffrey Bond, the former president of St. Justin
Martyr College that was to have been the educational arm of the
society’s project. Bond said he became disaffected with the society
when he learned of allegations of abuse.
Bond alleged that the two priests had the practice
of sleeping with young men under their charge, although no overt
sexual activity resulted, according to Dougherty.
“It certainly was a reprehensible practice,” Dougherty
said. “As soon as Bishop Timlin and I heard of it, we met with the
priests and insisted in the strongest terms that the practice cease.”
Bond said the priests claimed to have been instructing youths in
the “art of male friendship,” attempting to counteract a male macho
image that can hinder spiritual and human development.
There were questions about the Urrutigoity’s expulsion
from a seminary in Argentina. Dougherty said, “to my knowledge,
Father Urrutigoity was expelled from the seminary in Argentina because
he disagreed with the authorities there on a church matter. The
same was true of his expulsion from the seminary in Winona, MN,”
where allegations of sexual misconduct were made. Timlin and Dougherty
traveled there to interview the youth involved. “The evidence in
the case, when presented to the clerical review board in the diocese—an
independent group of clergy and lay professionals—proved to be insufficient,”
Dougherty said.
Following that investigation, the society secured
the property in Shohola and was given permission by Bishop Timlin
to establish a religious foundation there.
Bond, who was a party of the Shohola venture from
the beginning, said the group was also guilty of serious financial
mismanagement, spending money lavishly. Bond said the group has
raised at least $5 million from Catholic donors all over the country,
and claimed that a number of donors will file a class action suit
against the society.
“They purchased the property in Shohola for $2.9
million when it was worth much less,” he said. “They were poorly
advised.”
Bond said the society spent $136,000 on furniture,
and $400,000 on a television promotion program. These allegations
were denied by Father Daniel Fullerton, a member of the group. Fullerton
said the three houses on the property were devoid of furniture and
equipment, including kitchen and dining facilities. Fullerton further
stated that approximately $80,000 was spent on the television project,
not $400,000.
Bond, who accused Bishop Timlin of gross negligence,
said the bishop was trying to cover up the affair because the diocese
is financially responsible for the debts the society incurs. But
“the diocese is not at all responsible for the debts incurred by
the society,” Dougherty said. “They are a separate entity with their
own board of directors.”
Bond and a national group of conservative Catholic
laity, called “Roman Catholic Faithful,” are asking for Timlin to
resign because of his failure to properly investigate the allegations
and to remove the priests sooner.
“To say that the diocese refused to take action
is simply not true,” Dougherty said. “Bishop Timlin and the Diocese
of Scranton have done all they can to investigate this case and
to be fair to all sides. What we need is proof. In a number of instances,
we don’t know what happened. We can not condemn someone until we
have proof.”
“They’ve had plenty of proof,” Bond said.
|