|
LiGreci
to challenge exemptions
By DAVID HULSE
GLEN SPEY — Frustrated by what he called lack of
support from state and county officials, Lumberland Supervisor John
LiGreci on August 8 said he challenges the property tax exemptions
of some local not-for-profits by means of local law.
Reporting to the town board last Wednesday, LiGreci
said his layman’s research of state law seemed to indicate that
the town has some powers to remove exemptions by local law. “I intend
to give them a tax bill,” he said to applause from the audience.
The supervisor said he anticipated that his action would lead to
a court challenge from the tax-exempt property owners.
LiGreci said he hoped to make enough noise to lend
support to Senator John Bonacic’s plan to bring debate on reform
of state property tax exemption laws to the floor of the Senate.
“I will not stop. I have an obligation to the people of this town,”
LiGreci said.
Town Attorney Brian Edwards was on hand, but did
not comment on LiGreci’s plans.
Sullivan County Legislator Kathy LaBuda (D-2) was
also in the audience. LaBuda recalled the Town of Fallsburg’s failed
efforts to tax the tax-exempt Siddha Meditation Ashram. “The judge
ruled in favor of the ashram. You’re going to spend a lot of money,”
she warned.
Commenting the following day, County Attorney Ira
Cohen said that “as much as I’d like to think [LiGreci] is right,
he’s wrong,” about his interpretation of the law.
Cohen also disputed LiGreci’s charge of non-support
from the county. Months ago, when LiGreci first began crusading
for loopholes to change tax-exempt law, Cohen said he telephoned
the supervisor, saying, “We [Sullivan County] agree with you and
we would be happy support you.”
“He promised to stay in touch, but I’ve never heard
from him since then,” Cohen concluded.
Town Clerk Christina Bodnaruik found LaBuda’s warning
about Fallsburg appropriate. She said Lumberland has attempted at
least one similar tax action in the past, about 10 years ago, with
a religious group who owned property on Mohap Road. “We spent three
years in court and lost. It was very expensive,” she said.
|