|
Council
to revisit river planning history
By DAVID HULSE
NARROWSBURG — Two decades later and you can still
start an argument by mentioning details of the planning effort for
the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational
River.
Members of the Upper Delaware Council (UDC)
got into it last week as they began discussing which members of
the original planning group would be invited back to speak about
the 1988 river management plan. The UDC
is preparing for a mandated 15-year review of the plan with a workshop
this fall, said UDC executive director
Bill Douglass. The workshop is designed to fill in some of the history
of the process for newer members of the council.
The idea was to provide a list
of names, including professional and local planners from the project
and ask member townships to select a half-dozen they would
most like to invite back, and then rank their selections by priority.
A three-page list of candidates was included, with the names of
deceased and still active people crossed off.
Tusten’s Charles Wieland said an immediate problem with the ballot was that
two planners, Robert “Chuck” Hoffman and Michael Gordon, had not
been named in the cover letter as “automatic” selections. “I thought
we had agreed that these people were so vital that we would reschedule
if they were not available,” he said.
Shohola’s Bruce Selnick
agreed with Weiland.
But Executive Director Bill Douglass said no automatic
choices had been agreed upon. Townships should take care to select
those they want to attend.
Hancock’s George Frosch,
who recently spoke in opposition to a memorial UDC
resolution on Gordon’s retirement from the NPS, said he felt another
private planner, Michael Priesnitz, should
have been the automatic selection. “I can’t see Gordon [being invited],”
he said.
“That’s your opinion,” Wieland
shot back.
The mandated review will reopen the management
plan for revisions. While UDC members
have repeatedly stated the need for updating areas of the plan,
some also see it reopening sensitive land use issues that stirred
heated controversy in the past.
|