|
The best
of both worlds
An Interview
with Selma Field
By TOM KANE
Selma Field is director of public relations, marketing
and program development at Community General Hospital (CGH) and
executive director of the CGH Foundation. She has been instrumental
in instituting classes and programs in areas such as yoga, aromatherapy
and tai chi at CGH. Field spoke to The River Reporter recently about
her interest in alternative and complementary medicines.
TRR: You have been a pioneer
of complementary medicine for years. What got you started?
I got started a long time ago because my father-in-law,
Richard M. Field, M.D., was a world-renowned homeopath. When I got
seriously ill with complications, he dropped a few pills on my tongue
and within minutes I was cured. I became curious about it.
When I began studying other
forms of alternative medicine I found that, while current traditional
medicine is based on theories and drugs that come and go, alternatives
have lasted for thousands of years, consistently providing people
with relief—medicines like traditional Chinese medicine, for example,
Chinese herbs and acupuncture, and Ayurvedic Hindu medicine, and
native American medicine and, of course, homeopathy.”
How should this affect
our attitude towards orthodox/allopathic medicine?
This is not to say that we should not have a great
deal of respect for orthodox medicine. Certainly the advances in
surgery and in diagnosis have been life saving. They’re remarkable.
Basically, what we should be looking for is a synthesis of the best
of both worlds.
In a crisis especially, you will need the skills
of allopathic medicine, and people should have faith in their physicians,
who have gone through a rigorous training. There must be someone
who guides the healing process, in addition to the forces of nature.
Information was released by David Eisenberg of
Harvard recently that in 1994 over $4 billion dollars was spent
on alternative medicine.
I think the amount is higher that that. What’s
remarkable is that it is out-of-pocket money, not covered by insurance
companies. It’s an enormous trend.
It has been said that
orthodox medicine treats the symptom but alternative medicine treats
the cause of a disease. What is your reaction to that statement?
Yes, allopathic medicine is trained to treat the
symptom and most alternative medicine aims at treating the whole
person. It used to be called holistic medicine, meaning that you
are treating body, mind and spirit. This approach believes that
the goal is to enhance the immune system whereby the body cures
itself. And the other aims at attacking the symptom. It’s a matter
of strengthening the constitution, the alternatives say. Some people
call it the vital force, the Chinese call it chi. The Ayurvedics
call it prana.
What types of alternative
medicine are now being accepted by the medical profession?
Certainly acupuncture is becoming more and more
accepted. Many physicians practice it themselves or refer to another.
Certainly, nutrition has become an important part of medicine and
many doctors are referring patients to nutritionists. Also many
physicians have great respect for the role exercise plays in relieving
stress that causes many diseases, especially cardiac diseases.
There are many referrals now to meditation, to
yoga and tai chi and other forms of therapy that integrate mind
and body. And there’s a recognition of the importance of physical
therapy and massage.
Has there been an acceptance
of what’s being called “energy medicine?”
Things like Reiki and Semei find it harder to get
through to the orthodox community. Orthodox medicine looks for double
blind studies that are scientific, while energy and alternative
medicines present experiential and anecdotal results.
The growth of alternative
medicine has been enormous in recent years. Why do you think that
is?
First, people are living longer so there is more
chronic disease. Second, there is more knowledge now, especially
with the Internet, in the media and elsewhere. And third, there
is dissatisfaction, even on the part of professionals, that most
medicines have side effects. While they can suppress symptoms, they
don’t cure the entire problem.
You get to the point where the doctor says, “Well,
this is all we can do for you.” And the patient doesn’t think that
that’s enough. So they begin to look elsewhere.
Years ago, the famed Maharishi Mahesh Yogi came
to Sullivan County with his Transcendental Meditation. Today we
have the Himalayan Institute in Honesdale and spas and things like
the Dean Ornish approach, which combines orthodox medicine with
the alternatives. The National Institute of Health and its Division
of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) has an enormous
amount of information on its web site where it reports clinical
trials on numerous types of alternative medicines.
Is there still a lot of
resistance by orthodox physicians to alternative medicine?
Yes, it’s true.
I think that, as more medical teaching schools
introduce courses in alternative medicine, there will be less and
less resistance. Also, many doctors who can no longer help their
very sick patients are beginning to turn to these modalities. We’ll
see more and more of this, I think.
The hardest thing to do is go it completely alone.
It’s still hard to find holistic practitioners who can integrate
the best of both medicines. There is a tendency on the part of the
lay person to try every thing because if a little is good, more
is better and that’s not necessarily so. You can get into as much
trouble that way as you can with anything else.
|