|
Mongaup
still a burr under the river council’s saddle
By DAVID HULSE
NARROWSBURG — A perennial opponent to new development
in the Mongaup area joined forces with a defender of the river management
plan’s integrity last week in a new broadside against the state
and federal governments and the Upper Delaware Council (UDC).
Phil Chase, who represents Deerpark on the UDC,
charged that the council had been “riding the fence” on what Chase
calls a dangerous boating access planned by the NYS Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) for just upstream of the confluence
of the Delaware and Mongaup rivers.
He also used the opportunity to take a new shot
at the National Park Service (NPS) for failing to intervene against
an unsafe action. “They don’t want to bite the hand that feeds them,”
Chase said claiming that NPS plans to inherit the property, along
with the nearby acreage DEC is ceding to the feds for construction
of an Upper Delaware visitors center.
But Chase, who has complained for years about the
visitor center plan, appeared to gain new ground in recalling that
the 1988 river management plan, the scenic river’s operations gospel,
did not envision a boating access at the site, only a river rest
stop accessible solely from the water.
An earlier challenge of the access produced a language
change, referring to the access as “interim” rather than permanent,
when the project was first challenged as a violation of the river
plan. In that vein, Water Use Committee chair Charles Weiland said
Chase was rehashing old issues, and that it had been agreed that
Lumberland’s approval would “be the barometer” for the acceptability
of the project.
“What was the vote on that?” Chase asked.
“That’s me,” Weiland replied.
“You’re running the council?” Chase retorted.
The exchange prompted George Frosch, the UDC’s
senior river activist, to issue a warning. “Be very careful when
you open that can of worms… If you can dump this, you can dump anything
else,” Frosch said.
NPS Upper DelawareActing Superintendent Sandra
Schultz denied that NPS had any designs on the access property,
and initially was drawn into the area to deal with a chronic trash
complaint stemming from informal use of the area.
The discussion highlighted a problem UDC plans
to deal with this fall, said executive director Bill Douglass. With
an eye toward beginning an updating process, the council plans a
series of history discussions about the river plan’s controversial
beginnings, mainly for the benefit of newer UDC members. That completed,
members will be asked to suggest areas for change in the document
as a first step in a formal revision, which would involve public
hearings and approvals by all the participating governments and
agencies.
|