|
Schroedel
pleads guilty
Lungen
drops death penalty on victim’s family request
By DAVID HULSE
MONTICELLO -- The tensions of the almost two years
that have passed since the slaying of Barbara Vogt came to a head
in Sullivan County Court on April 5 when Anthony Schroedel stood
before Judge Frank LaBuda and pleaded guilty to 16 of the original
18 counts of the grand jury indictment resulting from the June 21,
1999 murder of the Eldred woman, and attempted murder of her then
10-year-old son, John Thomas “J.T.” Vogt.
Sullivan County District Attorney Stephen Lungen
told the court that, despite his own desire to go to trial, he had
agreed to drop the death penalty. “Last week the [victim’s] family
came to me… asked me to reconsider… because of their concern about
the trauma that would be further inflicted on J.T.”
Lungen also admitted there were issues about Schroedel’s
mental competency, which had never been resolved, but he maintained
he was nonetheless certain about the strength of his case. J.T.
was the reason he had changed his mind.
Lungen said the boy “has been struggling mightily
to deal with what has happened to him and his family.”
Lungen’s pursuit of the death penalty would mean
J.T. would have to live with the aftermath for another 10 years
of appeals and the possibility of a new trial, Lungen said. At the
family’s request, he decided the boy should not have to do that.
“Once in a while, a case comes along when a D.A. has to put aside
what he believes should happen,” he said.
To that end, he crafted an agreement with the capital
defender’s office in which he would drop the death penalty and Schroedel
would admit his guilt and plead guilty to all of the pertinent charges
in the grand jury indictment. While the defense agreed to forgo
any appeals, Schroedel’s admission would become admissible evidence
if a future trial arose.
Lungen confirmed the family’s agreement in the
decision by moving from the prosecution’s table to the rear of the
courtroom, where J.T.’s father, John, and Barbara’s sister, Patricia
McDonald, stood in the gallery and answered, “I agree,” in unison
when LaBuda asked about their consent.
Schroedel’s parents, Edwin and Charlotte Schroedel,
sat at the other side of the gallery during the proceedings. Both
turned to watch the victim’s relatives speak.
Edwin Schroedel’s face was downcast as his 42-year-old
son stood to be interviewed by LaBuda under oath.
“Yes.” In a flat, low voice, the defendant affirmed
he knew what he was doing.
“Yes.” He said he had not been forced to speak,
and he knew his words could be used against him.
LaBuda questioned Schroedel about the early morning
break-in and his confrontation with the mother and son. Had he intended
to and did he stab Barbara Vogt?
“Yes.”
Had he intended to and did he stab J.T. Vogt?
“Yes.”
And he hadn’t killed the boy only because he ran
away?
“Yes.”
Did Schroedel know what he was doing at the time?
“Yes.”
At the conclusion of Schroedel’s testimony, Lungen
asked LaBuda’s permission to withdraw the death penalty notice he
filed in October of last year, in deference to Schroedel’s guilty
pleas to murder charges that would result in life imprisonment without
possibility of parole, plus combined penalties amounting to several
hundred years’ imprisonment on the indictment’s other charges.
LaBuda asked Schroedel for pleas on each of the
16 counts and Schroedel responded “guilty” 16 times.
LaBuda accepted the pleas and, allowing for a mandatory
six-week period for a sentencing report, scheduled sentencing for
May 15.
Neither the Schroedels, the senior Vogt or McDonald
made any statements to the media. Lungen asked LaBuda to further
remind television and press photographers in the court that they
risked contempt of court charges in the publication of any images
of the victim’s family.
Looking directly at a newspaper photographer in
the corner of the court, LaBuda said he had already spoken to the
media.
At a press conference following court, Lungen reiterated
his confidence in the case he would have presented to a jury, and
said that his initial position for the death penalty “is still,
to some extent, my position… I didn’t prepare for 21 months just
to hold a press conference,” he said.
The district attorney said he wasn’t prepared to
concede the mental capacity issue, “at least at the time of the
crime,” which he described as “one of the most brutal and bloody
crimes I’ve seen.”
|