| Woodstock,
Greenstock and the future
By CHRIS CONROY
BETHEL - There
was good news and bad news at the Bethel Town Board meeting on August
31. The good news: a multi-million dollar performing arts center.
The bad news: local residents are still waiting for answers about
the mid-August Green Party political rally that disrupted their
lives.
Starting on
a positive note, supervisor Allan Scott repeated the announcement
that had been made by Governor George Pataki on August 29. A $40
million performing arts center will be built on the site of the
1969 Woodstock concert, located on Hurd Road, once part of Max Yasgur's
farm.
Then Scott
turned to the other Woodstock-related matters that the public had
gathered to hear about. On the weekend of August 11, a Green Party
political rally took place on land owned by Roy Howard and Geryl
Abramson. For neighbors, it was a nightmare. For the town board,
it was a reminder of an ongoing problem.
"The event
was not in the best interest of the Town of Bethel," Scott said.
Neighbors of
the site, which, while not part of the original Woodstock concert
site was part of Yasgur's farm, then began to speak their minds.
No one had much good to say about the event.
Residents
voiced complaints about excessive campfire smoke, noise, drug use
and trespassing. Public nudity and urination were also issues.
The most vocal
opposition came from Harold Russell, the closest neighbor to the
site. Russell is a member of the town board, but made it clear that
he was speaking as a neighbor when he said, "I hope there won't
be another gathering like that." Even before the event officially
began, he experienced problems with loose dogs chasing his cows.
"I lost four cows that weekend," he said, explaining how stress
can cause the animals to stop eating.
When the discussion
turned to what can be done about the event, answers did not come
easily. Howard and Ambramson, who were expected to attend the meeting,
were not present to answer the questions of the gathered citizenry.
According to one member of the event staff, the only event representative
in attendance, the pair could not make it due to family obligations.
Noticeably
absent were any official representatives of the Green Party. Bethel
resident Ted Yeomans suggested that any legal action initiated should
include the party. "If it was their event, it is their responsibility,"
he said.
"Every year
we go through the same problems," said board member Lyndon Lilley.
Citing the history of the conflict between Howard, Ambramson and
the Town of Bethel, Lilley continued by saying that what he has
a problem with isn't what they are doing. "How they are doing it
is what I have issue with."
As a political
rally, the event did not have to follow the same rules as a concert
or other large gathering. In the past, Howard and Ambramson have
contended that they would not be awarded permits by the town. According
to Scott, town records show no instance when they or their associates
ever completed permit procedure.
"Anyone is
more than welcome to apply for event permits," Scott said. He further
pointed out that GF Entertainment, the main force behind the announced
performing arts center, "jumped through all the hoops" dictated
by the planning board. Board member Robert Blaise suggested that
the board seek out the advice of legal counsel, so that options
for action can be found.
In order to
deal with the situation, the board resolved to spend up to $5000
to retain counsel with the Nixon Peabody law firm, experts in cases
such as this one, to investigate the town's options. The resolution
also called for a request to Sullivan County to join in the process.
The resolution also allowed the Bethel Planning Board to retain
its own legal counsel so it can more immediately enforce its ordinances.
Russell abstained from the vote.
|