Clear sky
Clear sky
32 °F
April 21, 2014
River Reporter Facebook pageTRR TwitterRSS Search Login
editorial

To secure these rights


The constitutions of the various states spell out the specific powers municipalities within their borders possess to provide such amenities to citizens. A New York State handbook on adopting local laws, for instance, (www.dos.ny.gov/lg/publications/Adopting_Local_Laws_in_New_York_State.pdf) lists among the benefits that municipalities are charged with protecting “public health in connection with regulation of sanitation, disposal of waste products, interments, cemeteries, keeping of animals; protection of the public from the deleterious effects of industrial and commercial developments, fraudulent sales, weights and measures; proper growth of the municipality through zoning.” And the phrase “health, safety and welfare,” which summarizes those benefits, is one that one sees repeatedly in municipal and land use case law, not only in New York, but all over the country.

It was, accordingly, baffling at the latest meeting of the Town of Delaware to hear one of the board members dismiss with an epithet a townsperson who told them, after the board adopted a resolution that some believe could affect public health, that she would hold them responsible for any adverse health effects that might result (www.riverreporteronline.com/news/16/2012/06/20/delaware-board-resolution....) It is one thing for a public official to have a difference of opinion with some of his or her constituents about the health impacts of some activity—in this case natural gas drilling. It is quite another to abdicate responsibility when one of them expresses a concern for the impact of a town action on public health.

So though the board is within its rights to pass a resolution that, in its opinion, is not detrimental to public health, it must also recognize in doing so that it most certainly is responsible for the consequences should that opinion prove to be wrong. Every public official in this country is entrusted by our laws, our traditions and our founding documents with the care of their constituents’ health. It is, after all, a key component of the Declaration’s first inalienable right: life. They can’t just blow it off.

Getting government off our backs

The above kind and reasonable defense of zoning laws as a necessary
guide to life in a civilized society is applauded by every one of us who ever had to sit with a headache and listen to a neighbors incessantly barking dog. It overlooks, as do many of the persons who promulgate such laws, and especially many of those who enforce them, the fact that whether you call something a code, a law, or a stricture, they all fall under the domain of the Constitution, and its amendments. It is when, as in the case of the Town of Tusten, the ongoing creation of such an ordinance becomes a permanent fixture of town governance (re-write committee) that their real and insidious nature becomes manifest. There is a line in the constitution prohibiting "secret laws", and what is apparently happening here is a clique of acquaintances have been empowered to meet regularly and make whatever particular pet peeve upsets them that week into a law that will affect all of us. It is now illegal to hang out freshly washed laundry? or cover an item with a BLUE tarpaulin? How about an ORANGE one? I am sure the adepts who promulgate this monstrosity would direct me to READ it in its entirety. I did, and found the fact that people who could even contemplate interfering in this way with the minutiae of their neighbors lives proved to be a strong emetic. Especially when one considers that all of the elect who will lower themselves to do so, are EXEMPT from any and all these strictures by application to THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, made up of many of the same people involved in writing the codes. How wonderfully convenient.
The true menace, and the one so frequently appealed to in this town, and probably many others, and so reminicent of Nazi Germany, is at the heart and soul of this entire enterprise, The Denunciation. The secret (in violation of the fourth amendment guaranteeing being confronted by witnesses against) The august and omnipotent (due primarily to no true delineation of powers being published anywhere) office of Code Inforcement Officer, becomes the all-purpose threat to be wielded by those who are "IN" against those who are not. In keeping with the unspoken but very real disinclination of town government to place anything IN WRITING lest it be produced at a later date in court to be used as evidence , the affairs of this all purpose bogey-man remain sketchy at best. In virtually every instance of the holder of this office engaging a citizen of this town in my 15 years here, it has been after annoyance and expense, held to be either bogus or specious, and a result of petty vendetta. It is time that ALL instances of the use of this aspect of town government be bought under rule of law, and preceded by registered mail notification. No more illegal alien candidates sneaking up on the porch and peeking in the window. A THOROUGH vetting of candidates as to construction experience might also be helpful, as well as educational attainment, as insanely, the holder of this offices opinions outrank that of structural engineers and attorneys at law.